MAIN
EDITION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Picasso
Productions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reports by DUNCAN
MBOYAH
Nam
Lolwe is the Luo name for Lake Victoria, which means an endless,
undying mass of water. Yet the lake’s staying power seemed
threatened, thanks to polluters and the invasive water hyacinth.
With the decline of fish stocks and deteriorating water quality,
experts had already filed Lolwe’s death certificate.
As they say, defiance defines immortality. Lake Victoria, which
was succumbing to wasteful land practices and wetlands destruction,
has defied all forms of assault and is now a beacon of hope
for its users, including the regional fishing industry.
The lake has been pulled out of the jaws of death by an ambitious
management project funded by the World Bank and which chiefly
aimed at redeeming the world’s second largest fresh-water
lake after Lake Superior of North America.
“The project has helped set up a functional water quality
laboratory, the gazettement of fish breeding areas and a fish
quality laboratory, reduced water hyacinth infestation and has
also increased the assessment of the wetlands” says Lake
Victoria Environment Management Programme (LVEMP) project coordinator,
Dr Stephen Njoka.
The project covers the three east African countries that share
directly the 68,800 sq. km water mass – with a catchments
area of 193,000 sq.km. It was established following a tripartite
agreement in 1994.
The project’s purpose is to restore the lake’s resources
and support sustainable utilization of the catchments area.
It became effective in 1997 when the World Bank and the Global
Environmental Facility (GEF) agreed to fund it.
Some 10 years later, the project, which stuttered initially
owing to mismanagement, has produced results. A number of fish
species thought to be extinct, such as the barbus (fuani), have
re-emerged in nearby streams that feed the lake.
The hyacinth cover has been reduced by about 80 per cent, from
17,230 hectares in 1997 to 384 hectares in 2004, following the
introduction of the Neochetina weevils.
With a KShs6 billion (US$80 million) financial support, the
five-year project started with the initial launch overseen by
senior government officials from the three countries, giving
in a new hope to environmentalists, lake transporters and fishermen,
who had earlier called for the removal of the invasive and fast-proliferating
weed.
In Kenya, the implementation was carried out by the ministry
of environment and natural resources, and Prof. Joseph Ojiambo
was appointed the chief coordinator at the secretariat in Nairobi.
When the fifth year came to an end, Tanzania and Uganda had
met donor conditions or standards. Kenya’s implementation
was in disarray. Bureaucracy had made it impossible to access
the requisite funds.
Critics claim that government procedure led to under-utilization
of funds that were being returned to the treasury every year,
yet progress was slow compared with that in Kenya’s two
neighbours.
Protests by environmental activists and politicians forced the
project to be transferred from the ministry to the Kenya Agricultural
Research Institute (KARI) which would run it for two years,
from 2003 to 2005.
According to Njoka, who replaced Ojiambo, the donors chose KARI
due to its internationally acclaimed research work. The LVEMP
chief reveals that it has since made a lot of progress, ranging
from capacity building, harmonizing fisheries legislation, establishing
a water quality monitoring system, long-term management and
control of the hyacinth to inventory and resource survey of
the wetlands.
His organisation’s achievements so far can be attested
to by the European Union’s decision to upgrade the Kenyan
fish from List II to List I, a sign that the project has helped
to improve quality control to ensure safety.
Njoka notes that the LVEMP success has seen the re-establishment
of an EU export market for Nile perch, which was suspended in
1998 on claims of poor handling and storage.
“We have managed this far because of biological control
which is self-sustaining, a cost-effective and environmentally
friendly method of managing the weed,” adds the LVEMP
hyacinth component coordinator, Dr. Mwende Kusewa, who dismisses
the mechanical removal technique used in the early 1997.
Kusewa notes that KARI has also imported Niphograpta moths and
mites, other bio-control agents that are being observed and
multiplied pending exportation later to Tanzania and Uganda.
“We have tested these in other plants and found out that
they only feed on the water hyacinth”, she adds.
KARI has also trained 28 school teachers on weevil rearing and
release as part of its policy of involving the riparian communities
in the weed’s management and control.
“We have also constructed weevil rearing units in 15 schools
neighbouring the lake and also trained pupils and students on
the basic rearing skills as part of empowering the communities
to be self-reliant in our absence,” she reveals.
Kusewa is, however, worried about a few hot spots along the
shore where the plant continues to flourish with little or no
establishment of the weevils due to high nutrient levels in
the areas.
She says that their study has also
identified infestations within the river systems that include
Yala, Sondu, Kasat, Kuja and Lambwe.
In an effort to help stamp out pollution, the water quality
component has developed an inventory for point and non-point
pollution and nutrient inflows into the lake. “This has
made our work easy for we are now in a position to identify
polluters and advise them on what to do on a regular basis”,
says deputy coordinator Omanwa Masogo.
He reveals that a water mass balance for the lake has also been
developed regionally at 33m2/sec. With the setting up of a water
quality laboratory in Kisumu that is to sample soil as well
as water, some effectiveness is now in the offing. An oil spills
and toxic waste disaster management contingency plan has been
developed.
The fisheries management department whose duty is to improve
the protection of the resource, has benefited immensely from
the project, considering that the E U fish ban due to salmonella
infections. A modern fish quality laboratory has been built
and equipped. “Through funds from the project, 113 fish
breeding sites have been identified and 98 protected and gazetted,
enforcing closed breeding season regionally for various species,
especially the omena,” says fisheries official Phanuel
Rambiri.
A survey conducted by fisheries officials also indicates a reduction
of fishermen from 57,000 to 34,000 between 2002 and 2004, a
fact attributed partly to the reduction or extinction of some
species.
Mandated to carry out studies on fish biology, biodiversity
conservation, sustainable production and dissemination of research
findings, Kenya Marine Fisheries Institute (KEMFRI) has gazetted
breeding areas as well as identifying biodiversity hotspots.
Support from the project also led to the identification of satellite
lakes [Kanyaboli and Sare] that were found to be home to species
previously thought to be extinct.
The study discovered rivers as an alternative source after the
barbus, or fuani, was found to be thriving in especially Kuja.
According to KMFRI’s Andrew Asila, two scientific books,
Fisheries of lake Victoria Basin: Their Ecology, Biology and
Fisheries and Aquatic Biodiversity of Lake Victoria Basin, have
been published to enhance conservation and sustainable use.
The study has helped identify areas where different species
do better, hence enabling scientists to introduce other at the
more conducive areas.
LVEMP, through the catchments afforestation component, has moved
to Nandi South and North districts as well as Kericho and Uashin
Gishu, where most rivers that drain into lake originate from.
This follows a study that reveals that the lake pollution originates
from the highlands due to poor land use.
“Ten million tree seedlings have so far been raised through
80 community-based organizations, and 3,555 hectares in the
forest reserve along river Nyando catchments alone have been
planted”, component coordinator Bernard Orinda reveals.
He notes that 17 farm units have so far adopted agroforestry
to reduce pressure on the government forests. “We have
developed a tree nursery manual for farmers, taken farmers for
exchange tours to Tanzania and also enlisted 60 schools in the
afforestation programme,” Orinda adds.
Under the component 11 water springs are protected, with 40
per cent being on the farmlands, while three more are under
construction.
Working very closely in the afforestation is the integrated
soil and water conservation component that is mandated to help
to reduce the flow of nutrients and sediments from the River
Nyando catchments into the lake.
Under the ministry of agriculture and applying the national
extension approach, the component that is concentrated within
Nyando catchments that contributes a lot of pollution to the
lake, has set up 42 tree nurseries and excavated five water
pans, besides protecting 13 springs.
Coordinator Joseph Chirchir attributes the success so far to
the communities’ empowerment approach through participatory
rural appraisals.
.As the wetlands continue being threatened following
exploitation by the local communities, the project has established
a pilot site at Siteko wetlands in Busia district of western
Kenya for research and demonstration of wise wetland use and
management. “We have also facilitated the patenting of
doum palms baskets and Marachi chairs to ensure ownership by
the Bunyala and Marachi communities”, discloses Stanley
Ambasa, the wetlands task coordinator.
Since Kenya lacks wetland-buffering techniques, the project
has contracted an Australian expert to help come up with filtering
techniques that will boost the municipalities’ and town
councils’ sewerage plants.
“The buffering capacity study is ongoing at Donosoyiet
and Marula wetlands in both Kericho and Uashin Gishu districts
in the Rift Valley and is expected to be completed soon,”
adds Ambasa.
|